[Home | Intro | Fetus | Brain/Mind | Ibogaine | fMRI | links | CV | Vermis]



Spontaneous Fractal Behavior from Ion Channels to the Internet:A Bridge from Molecules to Minds


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC

"The great field for new discoveries...is always the unclassified residuum. Round about the accredited and orderly facts of every science there ever floats a sort of dust-cloud of exceptional observations, of occurrences minute and irregular and seldom met with, which it always proves more easy to ignore than to attend to. The idea of every science is that of a closed and completed system of truth.... Phenomena unclassifiable within the system are paradoxical absurdities, and must be held untrue... --One neglects or denies them with the best of scientific consciences... Any one will renovate his science who will steadily look after the irregular phenomena. And when the science is renewed, its new formulas often have more of the voice of the exception in them than of what were supposed to be the rules."
-
William James from TheWill to Believe
quoted by Benoit Mandelbrot, in The Fractal Geometry of Nature, p. 28.

Introduction

Spontaneous Irregular Patterns of Neural Activity: Noise or Signal?
Implications for Developmental Neuroscience:
Implications for Cognitive and Neural Models of the Brain/Mind:

The Fractal Renaissance and the Sciences of Mind
What is a Fractal and Why Should We be Mindful of It?

Multiple Levels of Spontaneous Self-Similar Patterns in the Nervous System: A Bridge from Molecules to Brain/Mind.
Fractal Ion Channel Currents
Fractal Neurotransmitter Release
Fractal Firing Patterns in the Spontaneous Activity of Nerves and Cortex
Fractal Search Behaviors in Animals
Fractal Broad-Band-Binding in Cortex and Fractal Clustering in REM Sleep
Fractal Traffic Clusters on Highways and the WWW
The Fractal Structure of Fetal and Neonatal REM Sleep
Fractal Insights into Autism Via REM Sleep
Fractal Insights into Developmental Stress, Tramua and PTSD

A Fractal Perspective on the Dynamic Frontal Lobe: Hurst fMRI
The Tacit Infrastructure of Scientific Ideas Underlying Concepts of Frontal Lobe Function
Hurst fMRI and Lessons from Development: New Perspectives on Dynamic Brain Self-Organization

Unity Through Diversity: The Self-Organizing Mind




Introduction:


In creating a science of the irregular, Benoit Mandelbrot began a renaissance in the way order is perceived in nature, particularly, in the spontaneous irregular patterns of neural activity that are the foundations of mind. Central to the Mandelbrot renaissance is the concept that patterns termed "fractal" or "self-similar" have recurrent irregularity in space or time repeated like the layers of an onion at different levels or scales. Spontaneous behavioral phenomena at all levels of organisms from ion channel currents to the foraging patterns of animals to reaction time fluctuations generated by subjects in cognitive science experiments exhibit these recurrent fluctuations. Fluctuations, once tacitly overlooked and excluded as noisy, random outliers, reveal a previously hidden fractal or self-similar order in time that is transforming the way the biological foundations of brain/mind are conceptualized by a growing number of investigators.


Of principal interest are ubiquitous self-similar burst-within-burst patterns, observed in membrane potential fluctuations, neuronal firing patterns, episodes of fetal rapid-eye-movement sleep (REMS), and traffic patterns both on expressways and over computer networks such as the World-Wide-Web (WWW). Burst or clustering patterns are, in fact, familiar to anyone who has driven in or observed highway traffic from a passing airliner. Rush hour traffic slows to a standstill due to the tendency of nearby automobiles to spontaneously cluster, forming super clusters or jams, despite, and, as a result of, the efforts of drivers to find some open road. From the perspective of a passenger in an aircraft, individual vehicles appear to cluster into larger groups, dynamically jumping from cluster to cluster over a larger expanse of roadway. The pervasiveness of self-similar burst within-burst patterns becomes quickly apparent when commuters arrive at work and find slow access times on the internet. Although the self-organized fractal burst patterns common to both situations appear to be only epiphenomena, they place fundamental constraints on traffic flow.


Biological systems, in sharp contrast, appear to thrive and grow via self organized fractal burst patterns. These spontaneous, impulsive, apparently random movements common to all embryonic animals during development have long been enigmatic to researchers. Recently, a spontaneous fetal behavior, nuchal atonia, associated with REMS, the predominant in utero state, has been shown to contain intrinsic recurrent fractal burst patterns. Developmentally, bouts of spontaneous activity, such as limb movements or the occurrence of Active (REM) Sleep or fetal breathing, exhibit self-similar bursting analogous to traffic patterns, and appear associated with the development of lungs, motor systems and the maturation of the brain. Burst patterns appear to provide a means to synchronize the linkage of movements in the fetus with other neural motor events such as the ingestion of amniotic fluid, allowing long- and short range coordination among different emerging behaviors. In fact, as new evidence shows, developmental disorders resulting from maternal separation or in utero exposure to drugs of abuse, and autism appear to be associated with chronic alterations in these normally stable bursting patterns.


Bursting patterns over a wide range of temporal periods can be characterized by a small number of relatively simple statistical measures, examples of which are the Hurst and Lévy exponents. Hurst's rescaled range analysis provides information about correlations among bursts over all times. On the other hand, the Lévy exponent, alpha, is a measure of the probability distribution of events, specifically the tail or the variance associated with burst events. Concordance between both exponents has been demonstrated for fetal behavior and WWW traffic.


Hurst analysis is also useful in functional brain imaging. It is widely know that much of the variance in fMRI signals is due to background fluctuations emanating from the subject and not the scanner. Preliminary Hurst analysis of these task-related fMRI fluctuations reveals that brain regions, such as the frontal lobes, have self-similar patterns of fluctuations over multiple time scales. Self similar fluctuations may also exist at faster scanning times and higher spatial resolutions. Could this observation of fractal fluctuations in cortical fMRI activity have any relevance to current theories concerned with the neural implementation of cognitive functions?


Recently, the variability of neural processes has become a point of concern for cortical physiologists who want to precisely define the characteristics of cortical populations or individual neurons during cognitive tasks. Relationships between the variability of individual neurons and populations of neurons have been found to have much stronger correlations than previously thought, resulting in the transmission of fluctuations of single units into the large scale fluctuations of populations. Response fluctuations of single neurons to repeated stimulation are mirrored in population fluctuations, leading some researchers to conclude that the "noise" in ongoing cortical activity is an integral aspect of cortical function. Although the complete meaning of these findings are not yet known, this burst-within-burst characteristic of brain activity is reminiscent of the spontaneous bursting observed in the behavior of fetal animals which enhances long and short range neural-motor synchronization during development. Parsimoniously, task-specific self-organization of functional relationships among cortical regions in adults observed with Hurst imaging fMRI may parallel the dynamics of fetal neural-motor development.


Extensive descriptions of self-similar patterns of behavior at many levels of neural, behavioral and social organization point to a new foundation upon which theoretical and experimental investigations of brain function can be unified. Clearly, the key question for the 21st century remains how cognitive neuroscience will, in the words of William James "...steadily look after the irregular phenomena (fractal fluctuations)" and incorporate these comprehensive observations of the spontaneous self-organization of behavior to "...renovate..." the sciences of mind. [Top]


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC


Spontaneous Irregular Patterns of Neural Activity: Noise or Signal?


Science often progresses through the cross fertilization of ideas between very different fields of investigation. One example, the concept of "signal to noise ratio", originally developed and used in radar detection, is used widely in descriptions of activity in the nervous system. This concept is commonly used in cognitive neuroscience to describe, for example, how release of the neurotransmitter norepinephrine in frontal cortex reduces the spontaneous background neural "noise" and enhances detection of "signal" at the cellular level of a network (see for example Posner and Raichle, p. 224). Although this use seems appropriate for conceptualizing neural events and linking them to cognitive functions such as attention, it tacitly assumes that the spontaneous background "noise" is a random uncorrelated component of neural activity, much like the hiss of static between radio stations, which can be conveniently ignored in models of function or subtracted away from signal in experimental investigations.


Is this spontaneous background neural "noise" really noise? The famous comparative neuroscientist Theodore Holmes Bullock in his 1977 classic Introduction to Nervous Systems doesn't completely neglect or deny a role for neural noise in brain function:

"There are certainly sources of meaningless fluctuation, including threshold fluctuations, the convergence of independent rhythms, spontaneous activity, and other events with good causes but no [apparent] signal value to the system. This is true noise, and it may be large or small in proportion to signals; highly structured, or quasirandom. Since it is defined not by its causes or structure, but its lack of meaning or value, it is difficult to identify in any given case. We rarely know the system well enough to be confident of what has no value. Heuristically it is better not to label unexplained activity or fluctuation as noise or uncertainty. Calling it something like "unexplained variation" may encourage the search for both causes and possible significance (p. 236)."

That this "unexplained variation" is not restricted to neurons, but could conceivably be an important element in the overall behavior of organisms is implicit in Bullock's words. Kenneth Roeder, a respected insect physiologist, makes this point passionately in his 1955 article "Spontaneous activity and behavior" describing his observations of a variety of insect behaviors strongly associated with spontaneous bursting patterns:

"Many years of teaching neurophysiology along Sherringtonian lines, research on the insect nervous system in which spontaneous nerve activity is practically universal, and the observation of the unpredictability of most animal behavior have led me to seek reconciliation of these apparently contradictory aspects of nerve activity and behavior (p.362)."

Roeder went on to propose that spontaneous neural activity was the major drive for the appetitive, or searching component of insect behavioral patterns, as opposed to the prevailing view of reflex driven behavior.


Recently, through the application of perspectives and methods derived from and inspired by Benoit Mandelbrot's science of the irregular, fractal geometry, the assumption that spontaneous background "noise" in neural activity is orderless and uncorrelated can no longer be categorically accepted as true. In passing, this seems only a minor correction. However, this observation of unrevealed structure in spontaneous background activity has profound implications not only for the interpretation of many of the commonly used experimental methods and statistical procedures in the sciences of the mind, but also for the very way that the brain/mind is conceptualized.
[Top]



Implications for Developmental Neuroscience:

Spontaneous phasic activity associated with REM sleep may vertically integrate fluctuations from ion channels to muscle contractions and therefore, plays a fundamental role synchronizing the developmental linkage between neural and motor systems.

Just as sensory representations have been found to be more plastic than previously thought, associational areas such as the prefrontal cortex may have a more plastic organization when examined from the developmental perspective of vertically integrative spontaneous patterns.

One function of REM sleep may be to periodically present developmentally invariant fractal patterns to the adult brain, facilitating the consolidation of synaptic and large scale network changes.

These recurrent fractal patterns may be present in the phasic activity of nightly REM sleep and become enhanced during sleep pathology associated with PTSD as an intrensic brain mechanism for healing.



Implications for Cognitive and Neural Models of the Brain/Mind:

Experimental procedures that incorporate averaging, subtraction and statistical procedures such as interevent-interval histograms are insensitive to the time structure present in spontaneous neural activity.

Neural activity and communication occur over a broad spectrum of timescales.

Spontaneous fractal activity may underlie efficient searching strategies in animal behavior and human cognition.

Neural-organizational strategies based on spontaneous activity during CNS development, may play a role in the organization of dynamic functional connectivity in the CNS of adults.


This introduction will review fractal concepts and explore the evidence for these surprising implications, as well as present the authors's work on the ontogeny and role of REM sleep during development and the functional imaging of spontaneous fluctuations in the frontal lobes. In addition, findings of spontaneous behavior resulting from fractal fluctuations at many levels of neural organization will be reviewed. These diverse spontaneous behaviors appear surprisingly similar, and may vertically sum or converge across levels, creating the functional unity of the brain/mind.


The recurrent theme of this introduction, that order can exist over a multitude of timescales in data that at first glance appears to be only random fluctuations, cannot be fully appreciated in the context of the current scientific paradigm that places greater emphasis on a linear view of brain function in which independent elements can be isolated and dealt with separately. When this linear approach is used in complex interactive situations with long-range correlations (e.g, the nervous system), the wider context that lends these fluctuations their unity is obscured. Linear approaches, to remain successful, must be cross-integrated within the context of realistic, "practically universal" naturally noisy or variable behavior.


The essential idea common to the wide range of examples given is that the brain/mind lives as much at microseconds as at decades, and only by expanding our point of view to encompass a whole range of timescales in experimental or conceptual investigations of neural behavioral processes, can we more accurately grasp its functional organization. [Top]


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC

The Fractal Renaissance and the Sciences of Mind

What is unique about the fractal geometry of nature? Why should neurobiology in general and cognitive neuroscience in particular take notice of a new geometric view of the natural world that places emphasis on invariant properties derived from measurements over many scales of time or space?


We are now living in an age of scientific and technological renaissance, which, like the original Renaissance, is a time of accelerated change and advances in many areas of human thought, particularly in the sciences of the mind. Dr. Rhonda Shearer has proposed in her 1996 book, The Flatland Hypothesis: Geometric Structures of Artistic and Scientific Revolution, that the appearance of new geometries, such as the development of geometric perspective in art with the Renaissance, heralds the appearance of changes in thought and social values, foreshadowing innovations in science and art. Flatland, Edwin A. Abbott's 1884 book, referred to in the title of Shearer's work, depicts a two-dimensional world peopled by lines, squares and multi-sided polygons in a rigid hierarchal society with no concept of higher dimensions. When a three-dimensional sphere being appears as a circle in Flatland, his very existance plants the perceptual seeds of a scientific and cultural revolution. Shearer credits Abbott with the formal insight later attributed to Thomas Kuhn, author of the Structures of Scientific Revolutions, that scientific thinking is linked to the individual's perception of conceptual change.


If a new geometric perspective inspires innovative approaches to fundamental scientific questions, then the importance of adopting and incorporating the fractal perspective should not be underestimated. It is the contention of the author that without this well-rounded viewpoint on the spontaneous aspects of brain and behavior at all levels of description, the sciences of mind might become trapped in a kind of conceptual and experimental "Flatland".


What is a Fractal and Why Should We be Mindful of It?

Benoit Mandelbrot coined the word fractal from the Latin adjective fractus, infinitive frangere, meaning "to break" and create irregular fragments. Mandelbrot happily points out "It is therefore sensible--and how appropriate for our needs!--that, in addition to "fragmented" (as in fraction or refraction), fractus should also mean "irregular," both meanings being preserved in fragment" (Mandelbrot, 1977; p.4).


The concept is perhaps even more multi-faceted. The World-Wide-Web (WWW) is possibly the best place to see and learn about fractal concepts in general, and their applications in biology and psychology or just to educate the eye to the endless possibilities of fractal forms.


The term fractal applies to objects in space or sequences of events in time that possess a form of self-similarity: fragments of the object or sequence can be made to fit to the whole object or sequence by shifting and stretching. Fragments of fractal objects can be exact or statistical copies of the whole. Mathematical fractal objects visually convey the concept of self-similarity (see Fig 1).




Figure 1. A depiction of geometric exactly self-similar fractal objects. The Sierpinski triangle contains infinite smaller triangles of all sizes (as traffic jams or sand piles in the self-organized state [SOC] have avalanches of jams or sandslides of all sizes). Both the Sierpinski triangle and Koch curve are composed of infinitely repeated subunits which are indicated by the large arrows.

However, only fragments of mathematical fractal objects can be exact copies, and exactly represent the concept of self-similarity, whereas the fragments of natural fractals are only statistically related to the whole (see Fig 2).




Figure 2. Nuchal EMG activity sampled at 200 Hz and plotted over 40 seconds on the horizontal axis (top trace) represents a time series displaying statistical self-similarity. Rescaling time, the horizontal axis, over a 10 and <1 second subsets of the original series (middle and bottom traces) reveals smaller bursts within larger bursts of muscle discharges. Bursting in muscle unit activity over fractions of a second is statistically self-affine to bursting in EMG activity over hours.


Another way to think of fractals is in terms of clusters of points or events in space or time. Self-similar clusters have smaller clusters within larger clusters of clusters. Clouds, broccoli, or the surface of the brain can all be visualized as clusters of clusters in space. Phenomena with self-similar clusters in time, such as electronic traffic on the internet, spontaneous activity associated with REM sleep or neural spike trains appear very similar when displayed side-by-side
(compare Fig 2 with Fig 1 and Fig 2).


The repetition of "self-likeness" in recordings of physical or neurobiological phenomena is sometimes described in different ways depending on the degrees of freedom present. In geometric terms, if variation at different scales of measurement occurs along one dimension, such as time, the phenomenon would be called "self-similar". If fluctuations are present over two dimensions, such as time and amplitude, they are termed "self-affine". In this circumstance, the time series is statistically invariant under a transformation that scales the time and amplitude dimensions by different amounts. The nervous system is an especially rich source of examples of fractal processes that can be described as self-affine. In this essay I will use the terms "self-similar" and "self-affine" interchangeably, for descriptive reasons, although the reader should be aware that these terms are less interchangeable in other contexts.


Self-similar clusters in time have unusual statistical ramifications for data.
For example, the mean and/or the variance may grow with the sample size, becoming for all practical purposes very large or infinite. Mandelbrot, who first observed these strange statistical properties in price changes, commented: "To anyone with the usual training in statistics, an infinite variance seems at best scary and at worst bizarre (p.338)." These curious qualities are the result of large intervals or so-called "outliers" among the clusters, which give plots of the distribution of interval times long or heavy tails.


While not Normal or Gaussian, these distributions are related through the stable Lévy model, which represents a mathematical space of possible distributions mapped by the convergence of mean and variance, sometimes referred to as the "moments" of the distribution. For Gaussian distributions, as the sample size is increased, the mean and variance both converge. While in Lévy space, Gaussian distributions are mapped to an exponent = 2, which is determined by the rate of convergence of the tail of the distribution. Non Gaussian distributions with a convergent mean, but non-convergent variance have exponents in the range 1< < 2. Distributions such as the Cauchy lack both a convergent mean and variance, and have 0< < 1.


A unique property of distributions that fit the Lévy model is vertical convergence or "convolutional stability." Intervals from separate stable distributions like the Gaussian can be summed into larger stable distributions. Stable distributions are therefore self-similar over different sample sizes.
Lévy exponents provide one way to categorize self-similar clusters or bursts that have non-convergent moments. They have also proven useful in understanding the possible origins and roles of spontaneous fluctuations in developmental systems, as well as providing a measure of their pathology.


In the following section, a "cross fertilization" between the concept of vertical convergence from the Lévy model and many observations of self-similar spontaneous fluctuations at different levels of the nervous system provides a "conceptual bridge" linking cellular and behavioral processes. [Top]


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC
Multiple Levels of Spontaneous Self-Similar Patterns in the Nervous System: A Bridge from Molecules to Brain/Mind.
During the last decade, fractal patterns in time have been recurrently observed in spontaneous behavior throughout organisms, including bursting or clustering patterns in ion channel currents, neurotransmitter release, firing patterns in nerves and the cortex, search behaviors in animals and reaction time fluctuations generated by subjects in cognitive science experiments. Fractal behavior in time has the property that behavior observed at one sampling rate, say one millisecond, is statistically self-similar to the fluctuations sampled at a slower sampling rate, say one second. These clustering patterns, described as bursts within bursts, are, as Roder described in 1955, practically universally present in all levels of the nervous systems of insects and animals, as well as in the spontaneous behavior of many organisms.


Fractal Ion Channel Currents

In Roder's time, however, the subcellular domain of ion channels, which Hodgkin and Huxley theoretically connected with nerve excitation in 1952, was largely unexplored. With the development by Erwin Neher and Bert Sakmann, of the patch clamp technique in 1976, the behavior of a single ion channel, a cell membrane protein that governs the firing patterns of neurons by regulating the membrane potential, could be studied by observing the fluctuations of ion flow or current which occurs when the channel opens. The Hodgkin and Huxley model, based on what was know about proteins at the time, proposed that fluctuating currents were due to the random assembly and disassembly of rigid channel protein subunits that could only exist in a few states. One implication of the model was that the opening and closing events were not correlated in any way and a sequence of these events would lack any "memory" of or influence from past events. However, this fundamental assumption was questioned due to new and faster recordings of ion channel currents. Channel currents observed at different sampling rates displayed statistically self-similar patterns in time. One of the first researchers to consider and pursue this possibility was Larry Liebovitch, who describes his first consideration of the idea:

"At one session of the Biophysical Society meeting in San Francisco in 1989, each speaker reported that the rate of activity of channel openings and closings fluctuates in time, changing suddenly from periods of great activity to periods of little activity. Each speaker interpreted these changes as due to physical changes in the channel protein. However, one of us suddenly realized that this pattern can also be produced by [a] fractal process...That is, if there were bursts within bursts, of openings and closings, then data collected within the upper hierchies of bursts would show very high activity, data collected between the bursts would show very low activity, and data collected at the borders of these hierchies would show sudden changes in the level of activity, even though there was no physical change in the ion channel protein. This fractal description was supported by the qualitative self-similar appearance of the current records...(p.184, from Fractal Physiology, 1994)."

Although the fractal model is still in dispute and awaits the development of new experimental techniques to support or refute its claims, a large body of experimental data and simulations support the model, as well as new findings that the conformational states of proteins exist over a wide range of time scales. A large number of equal energy conformational states provide flexibility, allowing local fluctuations in membrane fluidity, ion species, and influences from the cell's protein skeleton to self-organize the channel structure into open and closed states. Dr. Liebovitch's work promises to provide new insights into elements of the cell that are critical in neurotransmisson. [Top]


Fractal Neurotransmitter Release
The next level of the CNS where self-similar bursting patterns have been observed is at the primary event of neurotransmisson or communcation among neurons or between neurons and other tissues: the synaptic release of neurotransmitters. Steve Lowen, of Boston University, has recently published a major paper describing the fractal properties of the spontaneous release of "packets" of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter involved in movement, in a single cultured neuromuscular junction between an embryonic muscle cell and a motor neuron. Fat and Katz, in the early 1950's proposed, based on analysis of short recordings, that the release of acetylcholine packets was a memoryless random process, akin to random processes like the radioactive decay of atoms. Because their work is considered one of the cornerstones of modern electrophysiology, and was in accord with views that are commonplace to this day concering the role of random process in biological systems, longer sequences had never been examined. Dr. Lowen was able to show that, although the frequency of packet release varied constantly, the variation exhibited memory. If like the Hodgkin and Huxley model of ion channels, there was a complete lack of any "memory", fluctuations would average out over long time periods. In fact, Lowen found that release fluctuates in the same way over many time scales, as do fractal bursting patterns in ion channels or the firing patterns of neurons. He has also proposed models based on fractal processes or fractal firing patterns, that can describe how ion channel fluctuations are reflected in the clustering patterns of acetylcholine packets or neuronal firing patterns.
Fractal Firing Patterns in the Spontaneous Activity of Nerves and Cortex

In 1964, Gerstein and Mandelbrot, recording from cortical neurons, found that in some cells the distribution of spike trains (a spike is associated with a neural firing event) were self-similar. As stated by Gerstein and Mandelbrot:

"Thus, incontradiction to our intuitive feelings, increasing the length of available data for such processes does not reduce the irregularity and does not make sample mean or sample variance converge."

Since this early report, a great wealth of information about the fractal firing patterns of many different types of neurons, particularly those of the auditory nerve and visual system, has been published over the last 15 years by Malvin Teich, also of Boston University and a colleague of Dr. Lowen's.


Many early observations of firing patterns throughout the visual system suggested the presence of long-range correlations; however many of these recordings were brief and the mean and variances were calculated over short observation windows. In many cases, under Gaussian assumptions, occurrences of high variability were excluded. Teich describes how, in a recent report by Softky and Koch, about firing patterns in visual cortex neurons, the investigators state that data segments were selected for "constant firing rate" to suppress nature bursting and variability, which they considered noise.


Dr. Teich's work strongly supports the existence of spike train patterns from numerous regions of the CNS which show fractal characteristics over many orders of time just as neurotransmitter release, or ion channel currents. If self similar patterns of activity enable vertical convergence of fluctuations over diverse levels of neural organization, how is this adaptive for organisms?[Top]



Fractal Search Behaviors in Animals

Spontaneous patterns of animal behavior frequently show the existence of long-range correlations and spatial and temporal clustering patterns. The fruit fly Drosophila exibits episodes of apparently continuous activity that have shorter episodes of inactivity embedded within them; as a consequence there is no natural time scale for the measurement of the level of activity and the level of measured activity depends on the length of time measured. Fractal time variation in activity leads to movement patterns best modeled as fractal random walks or Lévy walks which are the spatial analog of Lévy distributions.


For example, a recent analysis of the search patterns of albatrosses, recorded electronically while they foraged in the south Atlantic over a period of three months, demonstrated spatial and temporal fractal organization. The complex patterns observed seemed to allow the birds to efficiently search a large region of open water and were modeled successfully as Lévy walks. In addition, many features of the earth's surface and environment are irregular fractals in space or time. If vertical convergence of self-similar spontaneous activity at cellular and neural levels is a normal functional aspect of the brain which results in efficient searching strategies, it would provide an adaptive advantage to organisms in a world filled with fractal characteristics.
Roder was aware of the connection between spontaneous activity in nerves and in behavior; however he lacked the concept of fractals and the tools to measure and compare fractal patterns:

"The circumstances of spontaneity in nerve elements are strikingly analogous to those of kinesis or appetitive [search] behavior. However, it is very difficult to determine whether or not a causal or homologous relationship exists between these two types of biological activity (p. 368)."

I am sensitive to Roder's predicament, having also observed visually the relationship between spontaneous patterns of twitching in baby rats and behavioral state development and was unsure scientifically how to explore the connections between these phenomena. In the next section I will describe the methods I was able to apply in order to investigate the relationship between spontaneous activity and the structure of REM sleep in developing animals.


Fractal Broad-Band-Binding in Cortex and Fractal Clustering in REM Sleep
As a graduate student at the Center for Complex Systems at Florida Atlantic University, my emphasis was on understanding the dynamics of brain function and its developmental origins. With Steve Bressler and Arnold Mandell I investigated the spectral characteristics of the cortical EEG during different attentional states in primates, finding fractal patterns of coherence, called 1/f or broadband coherence, during these states. Inspired by these observations of fractal processes in neurobiology, as well as the sense that this important perspective was neglected, I felt it necessary to attempt an up-to-date overview of the fractal organization of temporal processes in the brain. This attempt resulted in my 1996 chapter with Arnold Mandell, entitled "Fractal Time and the Foundations of Consciousness: Vertical Convergence of 1/f Phenomena from Ion Channels to Behavioral States," which reviewed the wide-spread prevalence of fractal spontaneous processes in the brain which ultimately shape behavior. We proposed, based on theoretical work and experimental data, that this property may enable interactions across levels of neural organization, a kind of broadband as opposed to the now popular "40 Hz" or narrow band binding during attentional cognition which will be discussed later in a section on Hurst fMRI.


In our 1996 chapter, we also proposed a developmental hypothesis concerning the fractal nature of rapid eye movement (REM) sleep over the life span of a mammal, from fetal to adult life. In order to investigate further this developmental fractal hypothesis of REM sleep, I needed to study the occurrence of this state in fetal and newborn animals. I chose to study nuchal atonia or the loss of nuchal muscular tone in the primary anti-gravity muscles of the neck which is a key indication of the onset of REM sleep in many animal species. Nuchal atonia becomes apparent when anyone tries to sleep in an airplane seat; as one goes into REM sleep, nuchal atonia occurs and one's head drops, usually waking him or her up. Nuchal atonia can be studied by recording the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the neck muscle, which is much lower during periods of REM sleep. I was able to obtain neck EMG recordings from fetal sheep recorded over the last 13 days of in utero life before birth. I also made recordings of neck EMG in baby rats, while they slept in a warm incubator.


This data required a method to detect and measure self-similar clustering patterns allowing comparisons between different data sets. One method called Hurst analysis appeared simple to program, robust for small sample sizes, and allowed comparisons across data sets.
Hurst Rescaled Range Analysis, or simply Hurst analysis, was developed by the British hydrologist Harold E. Hurst, during the engineering of the high Aswan dam in the 1950's, to determine from historical records if the yearly flows of the Nile were random or clustered from year to year. Hurst reasoned if high and low Nile flows were random over successive years (i.e., did not cluster in sequences of high or low years), then the reservoir size estimate could be based on the average of the recorded flows. On the other hand, if years of large Nile flows were not independent, but clustered or demonstrated serial dependency over successive years, then the "memory", or carry over between a series of wet years, could create a situation where reservoir capacity would have to be larger than the estimate based on the mean. Hurst examined 800 years of Nile flows recorded at the Roda gauge and determined they were not random but tended to cluster in runs of high or low years, supporting the need for a larger reservoir. He also examined 837 records of other natural phenomena (e.g., annual river levels, rainfall, temperature and pressure records, tree rings, varves, sunspot activity) finding non-random positive correlations in most of them.


Hurst's method provides information about correlations among each burst or cluster event in a time series (see Fig 3). For collections of events of different sizes, the difference between each event and the average of events is obtained and successively added to a cumulative sum. For example, for a total of 256 events, cumulative sums would be generated for subsets of size 4, 8, 16, 32, 64, 128, and 256. A normalized range is then obtained by taking the difference between the maximum and minimum values that the cumulative sum attains (for each subset), and dividing by the standard deviation of events for each subset. The average normalized range for each subset is then plotted against the size of the given subset on a log-log axis, and the slope of the relationship is calculated, yielding the Hurst exponent. When this exponent, called simply "H", is > 0.5, positive correlations exist among all events and self-similar burst within burst patterns abound. The "memory" in the clustering over time is termed "persistence", as in the reoccurrence of high river levels seen in the Mississippi river over the last decade. However, H = 0.5 indicates randomness and a lack of correlation between burst events, and no long correlations are seen. Many of the natural phenomena that Hurst examined had values of H = 0.75. My own investigations of spontaneous activity in fetal and neonatal animals found H ranged from 0.70 to 0.80. [Top]


R/S.PICT
Figure 3. On the left hand side, the segmentation of the time series as it occurs in Hurst analysis is represented. The time series is divided sequentially into1/2n blocks. The right hand figure plots the average Rescaled Range for a collection of blocks at each value of n versus the window size (1/2n).

Hurst analysis has, over the last five years, been applied more frequently in engineering and neuroscience. Hurst analysis also seems useful in fMRI analysis, to characterize the spatial distribution of self-similar fluctuation patterns in the brain. Applications of Hurst analysis to internet traffic have been particularly insightful, shedding light on how burst-within-burst patterns arise in complex networks, which may supply ideas for visualizing developmental and cognitive processes self-organized by spontaneous bursting.


Fractal Traffic Clusters on Highways and the WWW
At first glance it might seem strange to be discussing fractal patterns of traffic in an essay on the brain/mind. However, these complex meta-systems share some characteristics with the complex systems of brain/minds that construct and constantly interact with them. Traffic systems are complex spatially distributed entities which function over many time scales. Heuristically, an overview of recent descriptions of self-similarity in internet traffic, and attendant models may give useful insights appliable toward understanding the origin and function of fractal bursting in developmental systems.


Would it be possible to use highways and freeways more efficiently by keeping traffic flow in a regime of maximum flow for example? As it turns out the characteristics of this regime of traffic flow are complex and poorly understood. In fact, work using simplified models of traffic flow indicates that, in situations where the highway is filled with cars, usually on holidays, fractal clusters of traffic jams of all sizes are more likely to occur. When one driver breaks too soon or too late, an avalanche of stops and starts is propagated for great distances over the highway, resulting in long-tailed distributions of and long-range correlations in inter-car-intervals. Traffic tends in general to self organize into a critical state, where small fluctuations can lead to traffic jams of all sizes. Steps taken to reduce jams, for example, mandating automatic car following systems as in simulations, push traffic closer to the critical point where jams are more likely to occur. Traffic jams could be considered a one dimensional model of vertical integration, in which all cars are effectively locked in one huge spontaneous fluctuation. Traffic jams in developing brains may lead to the enhancement of synaptic connections, sparing of axons, and synchronizing twitches that allow distant regions of the unconnected organism to link and coordinate gene expression and motor development.


Traffic jams on the internet are more complex, because of their multdimensional nature (literally a many-dimensional spider web) and rich connectedness, and therefore are more relevant to developing organisms and the brain. Information travels over the internet in the form of packets with a wide range of sizes. As a result the occurrence of bursts is more pronounced, because this form of traffic spans vastly different timescales, from microseconds to seconds and minutes. These bursting patterns have statistical self-similarity and are in some cases very similar to bursting patters from biological systems (see Fig.2). The fractal bursting patterns originate in the complex interactions between actions of file transmission, caching systems, user choice, file size distributions and user "think times". Recent fractal models of internet traffic have been successful in modeling many of its characteristics, including self similarity, long-range correlations, and clustering that results in long-tails. In these models, the superposition or cumulative counting of many packet trains with different short- and long-time characteristics generates self-similar traffic traces, with Lévy stable characteristics. Recent findings by the cognitive psychologist D.Gilden assert that fractal time variation is a basic element of human judgment and decision making, suggesting that the user, and his or her fractal processes may supply some of the fractal bursting present in the WWW.


Again applying these described conceptual models to developmental processes, we can see spontaneous activity at the cellular level as an avalanche within an ion channel causing it to shift into an open state, this in turn tips the fluctuating membrane potential into an avalanche of depolarization which then may trigger an avalanche of acetylcholine packet release that triggers a muscle contraction experienced as a spontaneous twitch. Like traffic on the WWW, this cascade of avalanches spans vastly different timescales, from microseconds to seconds and minutes.
Another aspect of this conceptual model involves the idea of horizontal integration. Developing tissues and networks must reach a critical level of connectivity in order to propagate fluctuations to the next level of developmental organization. An example of this may be the onset of spatial learning in young rats, which is individually variable, appearing when hippocampal pathways have reached a critical density. Another example that illustrates this important concept is the development of nuchal atonia, the marker of REMS.


Developmentally, during the early third trimester in fetal sheep, eye movements, nuchal muscle activity, breathing movements, and desynchronized brain electrical activity (EEG) are almost continuous. This may represent vertical integration of cellular spontaneous activity without much horizontal integration within the brain or among motor systems of the animal. Nuchal atonia first appears with differentiation of EEG into synchronized high voltage slow waves and an increased mean amplitude of desynchronized EEG beginning near the midpoint of the third trimester. At this time continuous or "tonic" nuchal activity starts to break up into periods of atonia, signifying the emergence of horizontal integration and neural motor connections. This reorganization of continuous nuchal activity into alternating periods of atonia and activity appears analogous in a general way to the emergence of spontaneous electrophysiological responses in early chick muscle or coordinated sequences of muscle contractions seen during later spontaneous motility in the maturing embryo. In addition, from about midpoint of the third trimester on, spontaneous changes in fetal movements (e.g., rapid irregular fetal breathing, mouth and tongue, diaphragmatic, and isolated body twitches and generalized bursts of limb movements, changes in tracheal and arterial pressure) become correlated with most of the criteria of REMS in adult sheep. The modeling of systems with bursting patterns over many time scales, such as WWW traffic patterns, may provide general models for neurodevelop mental processes as well as be helpful in understanding normal ontogeny and developmental disorders such as autism, or the presence of REMS disturbances in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). [Top]


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC
The Fractal Structure of Fetal and Neonatal REM Sleep

According to some estimates, the mammalian fetus spends as much as 50 to 70% of in utero life in the state of active sleep also known as REM or paradoxical sleep. Many have hypothesized that this state is fundamental in brain development and that it provides an internal source of stimulation during the self organization of the developing brain. Although the mechanisms by which REM sleep may accomplish this role are for the most part unknown, I have proposed that the correlated bursting nature of REM, or Active sleep as it is sometimes called in the fetus and newborn, provides an invariant stable Lévy temporal framework in which cortical and subcortical networks can organize and consolidate changes. In support of this contention, we have found that the structure of REM sleep is highly correlated and has recurrent fractal structure during the last trimester in fetal sheep, as indicated by Hurst analysis. Also, analysis of the Lévy stable characteristics of nuchal atonia sequences demonstrate distributionally invariant activity. This finding is striking in that it demonstrates that REMS processes are not random, as Allan Hobson has proposed, and supports the findings of Edward Evarts who observed almost 30 years ago that spontaneous discharges of motor cortex neurons during REM sleep in adult monkeys were similar to stable Lévy distributions due to an excess of short and long interspike intervals. Stable Lévy processes my have great significance in understanding the relationship between REMS and neural plasticity.



Fractal Insights into Autism Via REM Sleep
Tanguay, Ornitz, Forsythe and Ritvo at Stanford University in 1976, opened a new window on childhood autism, by their observation of the highly variable bursting structure of eye movements (EM) during REM sleep. They found that eye movements in normal children on the whole did not become organized into bursts until 40 weeks gestational age; thereafter changes in the clustering of the bursts of EM were correlated with developmental age. Also, from 2 to 24 weeks postnatal, as total REM decreases, the number of EM's remain constant resulting in an increase in the mean number of EMs/sec of REM. This recurrent theme in many developmental processes, horizontal integration or the coalescence of spontaneous clustering in this neural motor system, was observed in normal children between 3 months and 5 years of age. At this age, a major organizational change occurred in the patterns of EMs, marked by the increasing tendency of bursts of EMs to cluster, with more and shorter EMs packed into bursts within bursts. However, autistic children were found to have substantially less clustering of EMs. In fact, no significant differences between burst structure in 2-5 year old autistics and younger (<18 month) normal children could be found. If the horizontal integration of fractal patterns at different levels of the CNS is a valid concept, then the autistic children seem to display a failure to complete integration at this stage of development. It's as if they are stuck at one level of brain development. If horizontal integration can be facilitated by external stimulation, then this may explain the usefulness of the intensive physical therapy procedures that have been developed to treat autism. By sustaining long-range correlations in the behavior of the autistic child, vertical fractal clustering may be facilitated. This fractal perspective on autism could provide, via behavioral diagnostic tests and appropriate analysis of correlated clustering, a valuable adjunct to other clinical assessments.


Fractal Insights into Developmental Stress, Tramua and PTSD
In my dissertation work I compared fractal patterns of nuchal atonia in two species, the sheep and rat. I found that the properties of nuchal atonia episodes in both species were similar and inconsistent with random processes. One experimental confound of measuring nuchal atonia in baby rats is the introduction of maternal deprivation as a variable into the observations. Baby rats are entirely dependent on maternal care, as are human newborns, in contrast to baby sheep, for example, who are born more mature and are soon able to walk. Isolation of baby rats is a severe stressor. The baby rats I tested were subjected to two hours of maternal deprivation over the course of the procedure, and I noticed visually that their movement patterns seemed changed at the end of recording. I found that when comparing nuchal atonia patterns (across all ages) during the first 5 minutes of testing with the last 5 minutes, maternal deprivation caused an increase in the Hurst exponent from 0.75 to 0.86 and a decrease in the Lévy exponent indicating that their behavior became more clustered in time. This represents a major finding of my work: maternal deprivation, a model of early abuse, results in alterations of the Hurst exponent and the Lévy exponents, shifting distributions from their normal species invariant values. I was able to confirm that these shifts persisted into adulthood when I began my post-doctoral fellowship at McLean Hospital with Marty Teicher and Sue Andersen.


These findings suggest that early stress results in disruptions of vertical integration of fractal patterns, leading to fewer numbers of spontaneous episodes, apparently the reverse of EM changes in autism. What are the implications of these findings for child abuse, drug abuse and PTSD? Recent findings by many researchers, including the author, support the contention that stress or abuse in early life induces functional hemispheric asymmetries and disrupts the structure of REM sleep resulting in PTSD, predisposing one to addictive and self-defeating behaviors resulting from the lifelong effects of impaired interhemispheric integration. The application of fractal concepts and developmental perspectives will increase our understanding of the specific cognitive and functional nature of these disorders. In the following sections, I will consider the functional organization of the frontal lobes in light of these same perspectives.[Top]


A Fractal Perspective on the Dynamic Frontal Lobe: Hurst fMRI
"It is the theory that determines what we can observe"-

Einstein


To study the nature of spontaneous background cortical fluctuations in the absence of stimuli or complex task instructions, we collected, from a motionless subject, 640 images during a 10 min period in two axial planes through the frontal lobes at the level of the caudate. After correcting for any image-to-image movement of the subject, we investigated self-similar fluctuations by computing the Hurst exponent for each pixel in a 128 x64 matrix and overlaid color representations of H on the slices. Local clustering of persistent H values (H = 0.75) was observed bilaterally in the frontal cortical regions (see Fig 4). As expected, H values 0.5, showing random uncorrelated activity, dominate regions outside the head.


Hurst fMRI images, at first glance, look like PET images. However, PET images are the result of the collection and averaging of many positron emissions, and do not contain information about fractal time patterns during the collection. Hurst images portray the self-similar time structure of spontaneous Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) fluctuations which may contain a wealth of information relevant to functional connectivity among multiple regions of cortical activity. Although the interpretation of H in this context is not yet clear, common fractal characteristics may reflect functional relationships. Whether the observed clusters of persistent H values originate primarily from neuronal or other physiological processes (e.g. respiration, pulsatile flow, vasomotor oscillations) or a combination remains to be investigated.
H clusters of persistent self-similar fluctuations over the frontal regions are consistent over slices (see fig 4).


Figure 4. Top: Pixel-wise Hurst exponents in two adjacent axial planes through the frontal lobes at the level of the caudate; Middle: Hurst images displayed with sd=1.5 Gaussian Smoothing to enhance H cluster morphology; Left : Superior slice; Right : Inferior slice; Bottom: T1 slices approximating the plane of section.


However, H clusters seem to change in size in the same subject over a period of weeks (data not shown). Because we are highly confident that our motion correction algorthim has removed almost any frame to-frame movement, we believe these images could be displaying the cluster patterns of persistent large-scale cortical networks activated by the contingencies of the background task requiring the inhibition of movement (recently proposed by Bressler). We also believe that these images, becaused they have no inherent anatomical bias, can hint at the true spatial-temporally distributed nature of functional connectivity.


Hurst fMRI imaging is very different from traditional imaging approaches which attempt to subtract background from task, and then average within a subject and across subjects to find "invariant networks of task-specific activation." In contrast, Hurst fMRI can discern self-similar patterns in time within the same individual, and determine how they change under different task, drug or developmental conditions. The "background" is the signal. The correlation of other physiological fluctuations (e.g., respiration, pulsatile flow, vasomotor oscillations) with Hurst fMRI time series is currently under investigation.


Fractals teach us that spatial-temporal patterns cannot be fully described within a limited range of measurements, and therefore it should not be expected that brain "circuits" underlying cognitive concepts such as working memory are functionally organized in absolute spatially localized regions. In the next section I will comment on the apparent influence of "absolute" anatomical concepts in recent views of frontal lobe function, followed by a return to a discussion of the Hurst fMRI perspective on self-organized brain function.[Top]


The Tacit Infrastructure of Scientific Ideas Underlying Concepts of Frontal Lobe Function
Unquestioned concepts of absolute space and time in the sciences of the mind appear to underlie the ongoing debate over the functional organization of the lateral frontal cortex in working memory. Lesions of these areas in humans due to stoke or injury, although not discretely localized to one or the other region, result in overly persistent and inflexible patterns of behavior in cognitive memory tests that require flexible and adaptable strategies. Adrian Owen, in a recent comprehensive review and meta-analysis, details how two divergent positions have arisen over the functional roles of two anatomically and cytoarchitectonically distinctive regions of the lateral frontal cortex. One position, the modality-specific model, proposes parcellation of function based on the processing of spatial or non-spatial information, while the other position, a processing-specific model, posits that either modality may be respresented in both anatomical locations depending on the nature of the memory task. Although the results of Owen's analysis support the processing-specific over the modality specific model, he states in conclusion:

"Thus, at one level the dorsolateral and ventrolateral frontal cortical regions may be broadly [spatial and non-spatial] and each dedicated to a particular type of class of cognitive process. Within these gross anatomical regions, however, [spatial or non-spatial] fields may exist, each dedicated to a particular informational domain (p.1338)."

This statement at first seems to support the idea of a kind of fractal nesting of function in the frontal lobes. However, in fact, it highlights the bias inherent in mapping function to spatial absolutes. In some respects this controversy appears to be linked to the mere existence of two anatomically distinctive regions. If three distinctive regions were present would this be reflected in tripartite models? Is theory canalizing the perception of experimentors towards absolutes of anatomy and blinding us to the true dynamics of function?


In the author's opinion, without the new perspectives afforded by the application of fractal concepts in neurobiology, the sciences of mind are currently at the same stage of development that the science of physics was at the end of the 19th century. The central conceptual problem then, as now, involved unexamined concepts of absolute space and time. As David Bohm, the world renowned physicist, describes in his last and most insightful book with F. David Peat about the psychology of science "Science, Order, and Creativity":

"Even a physicist as original as H. Lorentz at the turn of the century continued to use these concepts in an effort to explain the constancy of the velocity of light, irrespective of the speed of the measuring apparatus. Newtonian notions of relative velocity suggested that the measurement of the speed of light should yield an experimental result that depended upon the speed of the observing apparatus relative to the light source. For example, if the apparatus moves rapidly toward the source of light, it would expect to register a higher speed than if it moved away. However, no such effect was observed during very careful measurements. Lorentz, in an effort to retain the Newtonian concepts, proposed an ether theory, in which the anomalous results on the measurement of light were explained by actual changes in the measuring apparatus as it moved through the ether. Lorentz was therefore able to explain the constancy of the velocity of light, independent of the relative speed of the observer, as an artifact produced by the measuring instruments themselves, and there was no need to question the fundamental nature of Newtonian ideas (p. 21)."

Much of current neurobiology and cognitive neuroscience is based on theory driven experiments, and therefore lives and dies by what Bohm called "the tacit infrastructure of scientific ideas." Bohm states that these ideas are essential to scientific progress but can become rigidified and unquestioned:

"...[A] scientist possesses a [tacit infrastructure of knowledge and skills] which are at his or her "fingertips." These make day-to-day research possible, allowing concentration on the main point of issue without the constant need to think about the details of what is being done. Most scientists, for example, carry out their research by using experimental techniques or applying established theories that were first picked up in graduate school. In this way a physicist may spend a decade investigating, for example, the internal structure of metals without ever needing to question this tacit knowledge in a basic way (p.20)."

Because of the dynamic nature of knowledge and the rapid pace of discovery in the sciences of the mind, this fact of intellectual life is extremely germane to ideas about task-related or spontaneous spatial-temporal patterns of brain activity, particularly in the functional analysis of the frontal lobes. In light of the large variability associated with spontaneous self-organized spatial temporal cortical patterns, observed with Hurst fMRI, would an experimental program dedicated to delineating "modality specific fields" within "processing specific fields" be useful? It would greatly benefit the sciences of mind to reflect on the subtle conceptual mind sets created by the use of terms such as "circuits", "brain regions", "cortical areas", and "networks", because of their tendency to promote persistence in preestablished entrinched, perhaps unexamined concepts of space and time in the brain/mind.


Hurst fMRI and Lessons from Development: New Perspectives on Dynamic Brain Self-Organization
As stated in the abstract, it is widely known that much of the variance in fMRI signals is due to background subject-specific fluctuations; preliminary Hurst analysis of these task-related fluctuations reveals that brain regions, such as the frontal lobes, display clusters of self-similar patterns of activation in time. As noted previously, findings of Broad-Band-Binding among cortical regions during an attentional task in primates indicated that the common temporal variability among cortical electrodes had a 1/f power spectrum (indicative of self-similar patterns in time). Both Hurst fMRI and EEG findings are concordant with the existence of dynamic spatio-temporal cortical patterns that are difficult to visualize or conceptualize within the current framework. As with the behavior of ion channels, neurotransmitter release and neural firing patterns, these observations support the idea that neural function occurs at many time scales, which may provide great flexibility in terms of reorganization and plasticity.


Could the developmental concepts of vertical and horizontal integration of spontanous fluctuations across levels and time scales provide insights into dynamic spatio-temporal cortical patterns? In the abstract I also proposed that task-specific self-organization of functional relationships among cortical regions in adults observed with Hurst imaging fMRI may parallel the dynamics of fetal neural-motor development. During development, spontaneous perinatal behaviors appear to correlate many neural motor systems of the body. This has been elegantly demonstrated by Scott Robinson at the University of Iowa, who has demonstrated that spontaneous movements enable coordination of limb movements in rat fetuses. If we view the adult brain as a complex developmental system, much more richly interconnected than the WWW, constantly updating, losing neurons, strengthening synaptic connections under local and global changes in neurotransmitters and hormones, and undergoing behavioral state changes, how might spontaneous activity create new order?

Hurst fMRI may provide a unique perspective on the self-organization of functional connectivity associated with the development of cognition. Are H clusters developmentally stable or are they more dynamic in childhood, becoming more stable with learning and maturity? How would drugs that enhance attentional function such as Ritalin alter H clusters in children or adults? We have very preliminary observations that Ritalin in adults alters H cluster morphology, making it more diffuse and less persistent. The study of the spontaneous self-organization of frontal lobe function during childhood and later life might provide new insights into the dynamics of spatio-temporal cortical patterns, and provide a interesting comparison with traditional fMRI and PET images of the same individual under similar task conditions.[Top]


Excellent fractal images by FracPPC
Unity Through Diversity: The Self-Organizing Mind
As an undergraduate, I was first inspired to investigate these ideas through the writings of Erich Jantsh, who coined the term "self-organization" and who saw the confluence of linear and nonlinear thinking in mathematics, physics, neuroscience and social sciences as an emerging paradigm with the potential to transform and transcend our traditional concepts of scientific boundaries:

"The emergent paradigm of self-organization permits the elaboration of a vision based on the interconnectedness of natual dynamics at all levels of evolving micro- and macrosystems. From such an interconnectedness of the human world with overall evolution springs a new sense of meaning."

Like an integrated, highly functional brain/mind, we must self-organize to consider multiple levels of space and time and to balance reductive experimental approaches with a global overview of the task at hand, in order to bring meaning to our explorations. Our world society appears to be experiencing a core social fragmentation, accelerated by the soulless march of materalism, marked by escalating drug addiction and suicidal behavior among our youth. Science reflects this fragmentation, despite attempts by individuals like Erich Jantsh and others to create a bridge between the fragments.

As scientists, we have an obligation to aid our society and attempt to provide a meaningful and coherent view of our world and our brain/minds to our fellow man.
In this introduction I have attempted to present in a diversity of levels of neural function and organization a unified theoretical and experimental approach to the brain/mind in hopes of creating a coherent natural integration of fractal views of nature with evolutionary, developmental and cognitive approaches. The larger perspective offered by fractal concepts to the sciences of the mind suggest that it is worth considering, and would, as James said, "renovate [our] science....and when [cognitve neuroscience] is renewed, its new formulas often have more of the voice of the [fractal] exception in them than of what were supposed to be the [absolute] rules." [Top]


[[Home | Intro | Fetus | Brain/Mind | Ibogaine | fMRI | links | CV | Vermis]



Carl M. Anderson, Ph.D.,
Consolidated Department of Psychiatry,
Harvard Medical School,
Brain Imaging Center,
McLean Hospital,
Belmont, MA 02178 USA

carl_anderson@hms.harvard.edu